The judicial systems in India and UK seem to be converging as well as diverging in recent times. Highlight the key points of convergence and divergence between the two nations in terms of their judicial practices.

Model Answer Approach

1. Decode demand: Identify the directive verb (discuss / examine / critically analyse) and bound the scope to Constitutional Comparison.
2. Intro (40–50 words): Define the core concept; anchor with a definition, data point, or constitutional/historical reference.
3. Body: 2–3 thematic sub-heads with crisp points, examples and counter-arguments. Add a relevant case study or committee/report.
4. Conclusion (30–40 words): Forward-looking — recommendations, way forward, or a constitutional/ethical anchor.

Structure Checklist

• ✓ Definition / context in intro
• ✓ Minimum 1 data point or report
• ✓ Multi-dimensional arguments
• ✓ Counter-view / limitations
• ✓ Diagram, flowchart or map (if applicable)
• ✓ Way forward in conclusion

Keywords to Use

Related UPSC Mains Questions

From the same microtheme — Constitutional Comparison.

• Compare and contrast the President’s power to pardon in India and in the USA. Are there any limits to it in both the countries? What are ‘preemptive pardons’?
  📅 2025 · 📌 10
• Discuss the evolution of collegium system in India. Critically examine the advantag- es and disadvantages of the system on appointment of the Judges of the Supreme Court of India and that of the USA.
  📅 2025 · 📌 15
• Discuss India as a secular state and compare with the secular principles of the US constitution
  📅 2024 · 📌 15
• Compare and contrast the British and Indian approaches to Parliamentary sover- eignty.
  📅 2023 · 📌 10
• Critically examine the procedures through which the Presidents of India and France are elected.
  📅 2022 · 📌 15