GS-II · Microtheme Deep DivePolity9 PYQs linked

Comparative Constitutional Analysis for UPSC

Comparison questions reward a matrix, not an essay. Pick 3–4 axes (source of authority, executive-legislature relation, rights regime, amendment procedure, judicial review) and place each system on them.

Core axes

  • Sovereignty: parliamentary (UK) vs constitutional (India, US).
  • Executive: parliamentary (India, UK) vs presidential (US) vs semi-presidential (France).
  • Rights: entrenched (India, US) vs statutory (UK — HRA 1998).
  • Amendment: rigid (US Art. V), flexible (UK — ordinary law), hybrid (India Art. 368).

Judicial review

  • US: Marbury v Madison (1803) — strong review.
  • India: Kesavananda Bharati (1973) — basic structure doctrine.
  • UK: declaration of incompatibility under HRA — no strike-down.

Federal design

  • US: dual federalism, enumerated Union powers, residuary with States.
  • India: quasi-federal, Union has residuary, three lists.
  • Canada: strong centre; Germany: cooperative Bundesrat model.

India's borrowings

  • UK — parliamentary system, rule of law, single citizenship.
  • US — FRs, judicial review, impeachment.
  • Ireland — DPSPs; Canada — federal scheme; South Africa — amendment ideas.

Common Pitfalls

  • Do not memorise borrowings as trivia; use them only when comparison is asked.
  • Avoid claiming Indian Constitution is 'best' — write analytically.

FAQs

Table or paragraph?
A 3-column table with a one-line takeaway per row wins on Mains presentation.
WhatsApp